«How Long Does Copyright Protection Last? (FAQ)». https://www.copyright.gov/help/faq/faq-duration.html.
45. «Copyright Registration Guidance: Works Containing Material Generated by Artificial Intelligence». Federal Register, Mar. 16, 2023. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/03/16/2023-05321/copyright-registration-guidance-works-containing-material-generated-by-artificial-intelligence.
46. U. S. Copyright Office, «U. S. Copyright Office Fair Use Index». https://www.copyright.gov/fair-use/.
47. Weird Al Yankovic, «"Weird Al" Yankovic Frequently Asked Questions». «Weird Al» Yankovic. https://www.weirdal.com/archives/faq/.
48. «17 U. S. Code 107 – Limitations on exclusive rights: Fair use». LII / Legal Information Institute. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/107.
49. «Authors Guild, Inc. v. Google Inc., No. 13–4829‐cv (2d Cir. Oct. 16, 2015)». https://www.copyright.gov/fair-use/summaries/authorsguild-google‐2dcir2015.pdf.
50. C. Xiang, «A Photographer Tried to Get His Photos Removed from an AI Dataset. He Got an Invoice Instead». VICE, Apr. 28, 2023. https://www.vice.com/en/article/pkapb7/a-photographer-tried-to-get-his-photos-removed-from-an-ai-dataset-he-got-an-invoice-instead.
51. B. Edwards, «Stability AI plans to let artists opt out of Stable Diffusion 3 image training». Ars Technica, Dec. 15, 2022. https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2022/12/stability-ai-plans-to-let-artists-opt-out-of-stable-diffusion‐3‐image-training/.
52. «Case 1:23‐cv‐00135-UNA». https://fingfx.thomsonreuters.com/gfx/legaldocs/byvrlkmwnve/GETTY%20IMAGES%20AI%20LAWSUIT%20complaint.pdf.
53. «Case 1:23‐cv‐00135-UNA Document 1 Filed 02/03/23». https://fingfx.thomsonreuters.com/gfx/legaldocs/byvrlkmwnve/GETTY%20IMAGES%20AI%20LAWSUIT%20complaint.pdf.
54. S. Andersen, «Opinion: The Alt-Right Manipulated My Comic. Then A. I. Claimed It». The New York Times, The New York Times, Dec. 31, 2022. (Онлайн). https://www.nytimes.com/2022/12/31/opinion/sarah-andersen-how-algorithim-took-my-work.html.
55. P. Dixit, «Meet The Trio Of Artists Suing AI Image Generators». BuzzFeed News, Jan. 20, 2023. https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/pranavdixit/ai-art-generators-lawsuit-stable-diffusion-midjourney.
56. D. Gershgorn, «The data that transformed AI research – and possibly the world». Quartz, Jul. 26, 2017. https://qz.com/1034972/the-data-that-changed-the-direction-of-ai-research-and-possibly-the-world.
57. Z. Whittaker, «Web scraping is legal, US appeals court reaffirms». TechCrunch, Apr. 18, 2022. https://techcrunch.com/2022/04/18/web-scraping-legal-court/.
58. M. Diaz, «Stack Overflow joins Reddit and Twitter in charging AI companies for training data». ZDNET, Apr. 21, 2023. https://www.zdnet.com/article/stack-overflow-joins-reddit-and-twitter-in-charging-ai-companies-for-training-data/.
59. B. Balter, «Open source license usage on GitHub.com». The GitHub Blog, Mar. 10, 2015. https://github.blog/2015-03-09‐open-source-license-usage-on-github-com/.
60. J. Markoff, «Ruling Is a Victory for Supporters of Free Software». The New York Times, The New York Times, Aug. 14, 2008. (Онлайн). https://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/14/technology/14commons.html.
61. E. Roth, «Microsoft, GitHub, and OpenAI ask court to throw out AI copyright lawsuit». The Verge, Jan. 29, 2023. https://www.theverge.com/2023/1/28/23575919/microsoft-openai-github-dismiss-copilot-ai-copyright-lawsuit.
62. «The AI community building the future». https://huggingface.co/.
63. C. Doctorow, «Copyright won’t solve creators’ Generative AI problem». Medium, Feb. 09, 2023. https://doctorow.medium.com/copyright-wont-solve-creators-generative-ai-problem‐92d7adbcc6e6.
64. E. Silva, «How Photography Pioneered a New Understanding of Art». TheCollector, Jun. 04, 2022. https://www.thecollector.com/how-photography-transformed-art/.
5. Ненадлежащее использование и вредоносные атаки
1. J. Haidt and E. Schmidt, «AI Is About to Make Social Media (Much) More Toxic». The Atlantic, May 05, 2023. https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2023/05/generative-ai-social-media-integration-dangers-disinformation-addiction/673940/.
2. D. Palmer, «People are already trying to get ChatGPT to write malware». ZDNET, Jan. 09, 2023. https://www.zdnet.com/article/people-are-already-trying-to-get-chatgpt-to-write-malware/.
3. Zaveria, «Cybercriminals are Using ChatGPT to Create Hacking Tools and Code». Analytics Insight, Jan. 11, 2023. https://www.analyticsinsight.net/cybercriminals-are-using-chatgpt-to-create-hacking-tools-and-code/.
4. «Russian Hackers Attempt to Bypass OpenAI’s Restrictions for Malicious Use of ChatGPT». https://blog.checkpoint.com/2023/01/13/russian-hackers-attempt-to-bypass-openais-restrictions-for-malicious-use-of-chatgpt/.
5. «GPT‐4 Technical Report». https://cdn.openai.com/papers/gpt‐4.pdf.
6. «Check Point Research conducts Initial Security Analysis of ChatGPT4, Highlighting Potential Scenarios For Accelerated Cybercrime». Check Point Blog, Mar. 15, 2023. https://blog.checkpoint.com/2023/03/15/check-point-research-conducts-initial-security-analysis-of-chatgpt4‐highlighting-potential-scenarios-for-accelerated-cybercrime/.
7. A. Hern and D. Milmo, «AI chatbots making it harder to spot phishing emails, say experts». The Guardian, The Guardian, Mar. 29, 2023. (Онлайн). https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2023/mar/29/ai-chatbots-making-it-harder-to-spot-phishing-emails-say-experts.
8. «ChatGPT May Already Be Used in Nation State Cyberattacks, Say IT Decision Makers in BlackBerry Global Research». https://www.blackberry.com/us/en/company/newsroom/press-releases/2023/chatgpt-may-already-be-used-in-nation-state-cyberattacks-say-it-decision-makers-in-blackberry-global-research.
9. M. Korolov, «How AI chatbot ChatGPT changes the phishing game». CSO Online, Jan. 16, 2023. https://www.csoonline.com/article/3685488/how-ai-chatbot-chatgpt-changes-the-phishing-game.html.
10. «LARGE LANGUAGE MODELS CAN BE USED TO EFFECTIVELY SCALE SPEAR PHISHING CAMPAIGNS». https://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.06972.pdf.
11. A. Sharma, «OpenAI’s new ChatGPT bot: 10 dangerous things it’s capable of». BleepingComputer, Dec. 06, 2022. https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/technology/openais-new-chatgpt-bot‐10‐dangerous-things-its-capable-of/.
12. P. Wagenseil, «Security risks of ChatGPT and other AI text generators». SC Media, Jan. 17, 2023. https://www.scmagazine.com/resource/emerging-technology/security-risks-of-chatgpt-and-other-ai-text-generators.
13. «Cyberthreat Defense Report 2023». CyberEdge Group. https://cyber-edge.com/cdr/.
14. «Poisoning Web-Scale Training Datasets is Practical». https://arxiv.org/pdf/2302.10149.pdf.
15. P. Dhar, «Protecting AI Models from „Data Poisoning“». IEEE Spectrum, Mar. 24, 2023. https://spectrum.ieee.org/ai-cybersecurity-data-poisoning.
16. M. King, «Meet DAN – The „JAILBREAK“ Version of ChatGPT and How to Use it – AI Unchained and Unfiltered». Medium, Feb. 05, 2023. https://medium.com/@neonforge/meet-dan-the-jailbreak-version-of-chatgpt-and-how-to-use-it-ai-unchained-and-unfiltered-f91bfa679024.
17. R. Goswami, «ChatGPT’s „jailbreak“ tries to make the A.I. break its own rules, or die». CNBC, Feb. 06, 2023. https://www.cnbc.com/2023/02/06/chatgpt-jailbreak-forces-it-to-break-its-own-rules.html.
18. 2625, «ChatGPT-Dan-Jailbreak.md». Gist. https://gist.github.com/coolaj86/6f4f7b30129b0251f61fa7baaa881516.
19. A. Roberts, «Exploring Prompt Injection Attacks». NCC Group Research Blog, Dec. 05, 2022. https://research.nccgroup.com/2022/12/05/exploring-prompt-injection-attacks/.
20. «Not what you’ve signed up for: Compromising Real-World LLM – Integrated Applications with Indirect Prompt Injection». https://arxiv.org/pdf/2302.12173.pdf.
21. «Prompt Injections are bad, mkay?» https://greshake.github.io/.
22. «GitHub – greshake/llm-security: New ways of breaking app-integrated LLMs». GitHub. https://github.com/greshake/llm-security.
23. M. Burgess, «The Hacking of ChatGPT Is Just Getting Started». WIRED, Apr. 13, 2023. https://www.wired.com/story/chatgpt-jailbreak-generative-ai-hacking/.
24. «DBIR Report 2022 – Master’s Guide». Verizon Business. https://www.verizon.com/business/resources/reports/dbir/2022/master-guide/.
25. «Facebook [131] IO Threat Report». https://about.fb.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/IO-Threat-Report-May‐20–2021.pdf.
26. «Generative Language Models and Automated Influence Operations: Emerging Threats and Potential Mitigations». https://arxiv.org/pdf/2301.04246.pdf.
27. «Information Disorder». https://rm.coe.int/information-disorder-report-version-august‐2018/16808c9c77.
28. «The Global Disinformation Index». https://www.disinformationindex.org/research/2020–10–1‐bankrolling-bigotry-an-overview-of-the-online-funding-strategies-of-american-hate-groups/.
29. «Misinformation on Bard, Google’s new AI chat – Center for Countering Digital Hate». Center for Countering Digital Hate | CCDH, Apr. 05, 2023. https://counterhate.com/research/misinformation-on-bard-google-ai-chat/.
30. «The Next Great Misinformation Superspreader: How ChatGPT Could Spread Toxic Misinformation At Unprecedented Scale». NewsGuard, Jan. 24, 2023. https://www.newsguardtech.com/misinformation-monitor/jan‐2023.
31. The, «Opinion: This Video May Not Be Real». The New York Times, The New York Times, Aug. 14, 2019. (Онлайн). https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/14/opinion/deepfakes-adele-disinformation.html.
32. «Operation #FFS: Fake Face Swarm». https://public-assets.graphika.com/reports/graphika_report_operation_ffs_fake_face_storm.pdf.
33. S. I. Observatory, «Analysis of Twitter Takedowns Linked to Cuba, the Internet Research Agency, Saudi Arabia, and Thailand». https://cyber.fsi.stanford.edu/io/news/twitter-takedown-october‐2020.
34. B. Strick, «West Papua: New Online Influence Operation Attempts to Sway Independence Debate». bellingcat, Nov. 11, 2020. https://www.bellingcat.com/news/2020/11/11/west-papua-new-online-influence-operation-attempts-to-sway-independence-debate/.
35. N. Deen, «CHI 2023: Misinformation Detection Models are Vulnerable to ChatGPT and Other LLMs». https://www.cc.gatech.edu/news/chi‐2023‐misinformation-detection-models-are-vulnerable-chatgpt-and-other-llms.
36. «On the Risk of Misinformation Pollution with Large Language Models». https://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.13661.pdf.
37. «10 Recommendations by the Taskforce on Disinformation and the War in Ukraine». EDMO. https://edmo.eu/2022/06/29/10‐recommendations-by-the-taskforce-on-disinformation-and-the-war-in-ukraine/.
38. «New research shows successes in teaching „lateral reading“ techniques». Center for an Informed Public, Dec. 07, 2021. https://www.cip.uw.edu/2021/12/07/lateral-reading-canada-civix-study/.
39. «SIFT (The Four Moves)». Hapgood, Jun. 19, 2019. https://hapgood.us/2019/06/19/sift-the-four-moves/.
40. S. Jeong, «Opinion: Politicians Want to Change the Internet’s Most Important Law. They Should Read It First». The New York Times, The New York Times, Jul. 26, 2019. (Онлайн). https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/26/opinion/section‐230‐political-neutrality.html.
41. «47 U. S. Code 230 – Protection for private blocking and screening of offensive material». LII / Legal Information Institute. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/47/230.
42. S. Goldman, «Could Big Tech be liable for generative AI output? Hypothetically „yes“, says Supreme Court justice». VentureBeat, Feb. 21, 2023. https://venturebeat.com/ai/could-big-tech-be-liable-for-generative-ai-output-hypothetically-yes-says-supreme-court-justice/.
43. C. Lima and D. DiMolfetta, «AI chatbots won’t enjoy tech’s legal shield, Section 230 authors say». The Washington Post, The Washington Post, Mar. 17, 2023. (Онлайн). https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/03/17/ai-chatbots-wont-enjoy-techs-legal-shield-section‐230‐authors-say/.
44. «Automatic Detection of Generated Text is Easiest when Humans are Fooled». https://arxiv.org/pdf/1911.00650.pdf.
45. «Unsupervised and Distributional Detection of Machine-Generated Text». https://arxiv.org/pdf/2111.02878.pdf.
46. W. Zhong et al.,
